The blog that connects you with boomers!

Alert! Your Water May Become Irreversibly Polluted!

ALERT: YOUR WATER MAY BECOME IRREVERSIBLY POLLUTED!

BLOGGER: STEPHANIE LOW

When my good friend Debbie Heiser asked me to write this blog, my first response, as always, was…no, no, focus on saving the environment… or become ineffective…we have so little time…and on and on. Until it suddenly dawned on me what a tremendous opportunity this is to do precisely that, to tell a BIG bunch of people exactly what’s happening just under our radar, and if we’re lucky, to raise such a public stink about it that it will “drive the devils back to hell,” in the words of the Liberian women who unseated their tyrannical leader Charles Taylor by sheer resolve and their determination to survive.

 

And that’s where we’re at–on the survival brink–only most of us are unaware of the massive disaster bearing down on us. Most of my smart, environmentally informed NY friends haven’t a clue about the threat that natural gas drilling in New York State’s Marcellus Shale is, much less what it could mean to us. So unless you live in that area (the southeastern tier of NYS), or have a home in Pennsylvania, or speak often with people from devastated communities in Texas, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Alabama, Louisiana, Arkansas, West Virginia, or Ohio, prepare to be surprised, shocked, outraged, and maybe even mobilized and activated.

 

If you live in New York State, you need to know that we’re at major risk of losing not just our legally unfiltered drinking water (the best in the country, along with only 3-4 other areas of similar size), but our water to bathe in, wash our vegetables in, water our cropland, splash around the open summer hydrants in, water our parks and potted plants in, and on and on.

 

And if you’re a Pennsylvanian and use the great Monongahela for your tap water, you’ve already been warned to drink and cook with bottled water. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette headlined last November 17th, “Mon River Solids a Threat to Machinery but Not Health.” (http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08322/928571-113.stm )  I wonder how many people laughed at the transparently political claim that pollutants able to damage machinery would leave human bodies unharmed. I laughed—an outraged laugh to be sure—but then I don’t live in Pittsburgh.

 The consequences of such a loss, were it irrevocable –and according to the Post-Gazette, “Water treatment facilities aren’t set up to filter out [these] contaminants” – boggles the mind. We’ve never had to contemplate this kind of disaster, so all its ramifications aren’t immediately apparent, but the potential cost of importing all our water makes our current deficit, again, laughable. Then again, NYC alone uses more than 1.1 billion gallons of water daily. New York State population is twice NYC’s—how in the world could that much water be imported? Water is life; polluted water is no water and that’s death.

 

So, before going on to quote how and why this natural gas drilling technology creates death, I want to provide a little background on why we’re talking about it at all in NYS. I first heard about it last summer, before the financial meltdown, when natural gas developers such as Chesapeake Energy were moving in fast to buy up mineral rights from impoverished landowners in the Marcellus Shale area. The Marcellus Shale is a northeastern multi-state underground geological formation lying partially in the southeastern tier of NYS. It contains largely untapped natural gas deposits, untapped because they were economically inaccessible until our old friends Halliburton invented a technique called hydraulic fracturing–or fracking, in the vernacular. Today fracking is used for nine out of 10 natural gas wells in the United States.

Briefly, this process shoots vast amounts of water, sand and chemicals several miles underground to fracture the rock and let the gas rise to the surface. “When the gas surfaces, so does the water—laden with natural toxins, including suspected cancer-causing compounds” such as heavy metals and radiation from deep within the earth. What’s worse, added to the shale’s toxins are those injected with the fracking fluids, now returned to the surface, where the tainted water lies in open, unlined waste pits, allowing the toxins to be carried by air as far as 200 miles away. (http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=705332 )

It’s claimed that the chemicals are so diluted as to be no threat to public health, but “six-tenths of one percent of two million gallons of drilling water still equals 10,000 gallons of toxic chemicals—and that’s just from one well.” (http://www.propublica.org/feature/new-yorks-gas-rush-poses-environmental-threat-722/ )  “The US Department of Energy lists [this] water from gas drilling as among the most toxic of any oil industry byproduct.” (http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=705332 ) 

If you’re wondering how these contaminants might affect our bodies, read the 2007 testimony before the House Committee on Oversight given by the expert Dr. Theo Colborn, whose credentials include a “B.S. in pharmacy from Rutgers University, an M.A. in fresh water ecology from Western State College of Colorado, and a PhD in zoology, with distributed minors in epidemiology, toxicology, and water chemistry from the University of Wisconsin, Madison.” She knows what she’s talking about. (http://s3.amazonaws.com/propublica/assets/natural_gas/colburn_testimony_071025.pdf )

 

“We are certain of one thing,” she testified. “Even at extremely low levels one would not want to drink the majority of the chemicals on the list.” Reading her testimony on the effects of the known 265 chemicals in the drilled water—and many are unknown, claimed as “proprietary secrets” by the gas developers—you’re immediately clear that you never want to have to worry if they’re going to issue from your tap.

Or you can read a much more personal account of just one of over 800 documented reports of “sickened people and animals, clouded…drinking water…flammable wells.” http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE52C07920090313?pageNumber=3&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=true  Pat Farnelli talks about her children’s diarrhea and vomiting, her own stomach cramps so excruciating that “It felt like an appendicitis attack.” Others, who can barely afford bottled water for themselves, watch their animals endure projectile vomiting and lose their hair.

The fact that this is happening in Pennsylvania is important to notice because the NYS DEC claims that NYS wouldn’t be subject to all the horrible environmental and public health effects seen in western states such as NM, CO and TX because the Marcellus is geologically different from ones out West. But Pennsylvania sits on the same Marcellus Shale that NYS sits on—the effects would be the same.

An even more frightening episode involving fracking toxins happened “in the summer of 2008 when a Colorado nurse almost died from exposure while treating a gas field worker whose clothing had been doused with the chemicals.” She suffered “from heart, lung, and liver failure, plus kidney damage and blurred vision.” http://www.ombwatch.org/node/3847 )

Although human health effects include cluster illnesses and death, drilling is currently permitted within 150 feet of New Yorkers’ homes and private water wells, and within 50 feet of streams. Toxins from the drilling process leach into wells, aquifers, watersheds and rivers, contaminating the water supply along with land for local farming.

But one of the worst aspects of fracking isn’t immediately apparent—it’s the immense amounts of water required. Each well’s ten possible fracking events requires 1-5 million gallons of fresh water. That’s a possible 50 million gallons of water for one well–and Chesapeake Energy, the major player in the Marcellus Shale, “is planning to significantly increase its Marcellus Shale drilling activity during 2009-2010,” according to its website http://www.chk.com/Operations/Unconventional/Pages/MarcellusShale.aspx). This translates into thousands of wells. Multiply each by 50,000,000 gallons.

Where is all this water going to come from?? The UN recently reported the current and looming water shortages around the world. It warned that, aside from creating “climate change refugees…water shortages are having another unusual effect: they are beginning to constrain economic growth…in parts of China, India…and the western United States…The world will have “substantially more people” living in urban and coastal areas vulnerable to scarce water resources.” (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090312.WATER12/TPStory/Environment )

 

In other words, we are looking into a near future when water has become the new oil, and yet many of our state officials are willing to officiate over the permanent loss of billions upon billions of gallons of one of most precious natural resources, in return for the very illusory fool’s gold of immediate tax revenues–what’s been estimated to be about $1 billion a year.

 

This doesn’t even begin to address the immediate fiscal fact that if NYC, with just half the state’s population, loses its legally unfiltered water supply, law mandates that it must build a filtration plant. Cost: $27 billion. (If you want to know where that number comes from, multiply the $3.1 billion Croton filtration plant, which supplies 10% of NYC’s water, by the remaining 90%, which flows to us from the Delaware watershed. Voilà–$27 billion! Not a good bargain.) http://boogiedowner.blogspot.com/2008/11/croton-filtration-plant-to-cost-31.html How the rest of the state will get potable water is anybody’s guess. And the future is visible out West. (http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE52A04P20090311)

 

All this doesn’t include the worse news that we don’t necessarily have the filtering technology to eliminate all the fracking chemicals, some of which the industry refuses to disclose as “proprietary,” like the Coke recipe. (Coke, however, does us the favor of listing its ingredients on the side of the bottle.) Filtering tainted water would be, at best, very slow, very expensive, and very possibly ineffective. Given that scenario, I’d consider moving out of the state. But a lot of people don’t have that choice. And then there’s the question of where to move to?  Over half the United States is under consideration for this kind of devastating gas drilling.

 

Other effects of drilling include incessant truck traffic, spills, rampant noise pollution, the destruction of forests and wildlife habitats, and the degradation of air quality. On many drilling sites, frequent accidental gas fires have burned for weeks. In short, New York’s bucolic hiking, hunting, and fishing areas—an economic resource for tourism–would become burnt-out industrial sites. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQOiJ3Ne7j0,  http://www.endeavornews.com/news/2008/1004/news/011.html    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxNpz41wSOg&feature=related)

 

There’s another aspect to losing fresh water throughout the state: over the last two centuries, rural areas provided much of urban food. Very soon, as we’re beginning to experience now, food from great distances will become too expensive to import. The rural areas that would see the most extensive gas drilling would not only have lost enough water to make food production difficult-to-impossible and expensive—it would have lost uncalculated acres of land to drilling and drilling rig devastation, which leaves the land so polluted that it becomes unreclamably barren. Losing our water to gas drilling now means losing our local food when faster-than-expected global warming creates local shortages. That’s in the foreseeable future.

 

Have you heard enough? Are you scared? Are you scared enough to write a letter to Governor Paterson and ask him for protection against this uncalculated risk? And get all your friends to do it too? He could Just Say No to gas drilling, but he needs to hear from a HUGE number of constituents to out-shout the voice of the natural gas industry, which stands to reap billions from the rape of New York. Meanwhile New York faces a budget deficit that is drawing the attention of all legislators and the press and the public as well.

 

Well, here’s a letter, all written, stating much of what I’ve just described. Copy and paste it into a Word document, print it out and mail it, signed. Get all your friends to do the same. And when you’ve done that, send a little post back to this blog to let me know you’re on the case. We need to stand together and work together…or else.

 

Stephanie

 

NEXT TIME: The Ban(e)-Boone Plan

 

 

Governor David A. Paterson
State Capitol
Albany, NY 12224

Dear Governor Paterson:

I oppose natural gas drilling within or near any of New York State’s drinking water supplies and call for a ban on such a practice. This includes but is not limited to the Catskill and Delaware watersheds, which provide 90 percent of the drinking water for over nine million New Yorkers. Such a ban should apply to all local watersheds and ground water sources all over New York State.

Gas drilling in our watersheds and near our aquifers would put our most precious natural resource — clean, pure drinking water — at severe risk of contamination. It will also pollute our air and soil, have negative impacts on people’s health, and increase greenhouse gas emissions.

Governor, the long-term costs of extracting gas from shale far outweigh any short-term economic benefits.  I call on you to ban it in New York State. But you can do more than that.

 

2008 saw a new national record for drilling permits—more than 7100. Over 44 million acres of public lands are being leased for oil and gas development. According to The Wall Street Journal, more rigs are operating in the U.S. than at any point in over two decades. The gas drilling industry is poised to expand its activities throughout the country. We cannot, as a nation, live with the devastation this will present to our air, land, public health, and especially our water. There are tremendous possibilities in the wind and solar industries that need to be addressed and promoted.

 

I call on you to lead a governors’ initiative to protect every state’s waters from the shortsighted pursuit of drilling money and its citizens from the critical shortages this pursuit will inevitably create. I urge you to join with governors such as Bill Ritter in Colorado, where regulations have been tightened as a result of toxic spills into streams, threatening the Colorado River and the drinking water of nearby municipa-lities.  You, as the Governor of an important state, can be the leader we need to bring sanity to a looming crisis masquerading as an economic opportunity. I call on you to be that leader.


Sincerely,

Your Name
Your Organization
123 Your St.
Yousville, YO 12345
Phone: (123)456-7890
Fax: (123)456-7890×123

 IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SUBSCRIBE TO RECEIVE UPDATES ON BLOG POSTS, PLEASE ENTER YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SCREEN WHERE IT SAYS “SUBSCRIBE”.  ___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Share/Save/Bookmark

For constant site updates, make sure to subscribe to our RSS feed!

Posted 11 months, 4 weeks ago at 12:08.

4 comments

Unprecedented is an Excuse

Unprecedented is an Excuse

BLOGGER: BEN PIERSON

“If you can get people to ask the wrong questions, you don’t have to worry about the answers” (Thomas Pynchon)

Everywhere in the media we hear: the housing crisis is unprecedented; the credit crisis is unprecedented; the economic downturn is unprecedented.

To briefly cover the basics:

As we all might guess, “unprecedented” means “without precedent”.

Precedent à something similar has occurred.

Unprecedented  à  no similar event has – ever – happened before.

This gross abuse of hyperbole frustrates me greatly for many reasons.  Yes, included in these reasons is that I move quickly into this emotional state… That being said, I’ve calmed down and for your sake whittled my complaints down to three.

1)  No, no no – these events are not unprecedented.

During the Great Depression unemployment peaked at over 20% and the stock market declined over 90%!  Maybe our (great) grandparents didn’t really walk to school in the snow, uphill both ways; they sure lived through some brutal stuff though.

If you want to argue ‘unprecedented during our life time’ at least, wrong once again.

Quick Quiz:  Who am I?  I had an unemployment rate over 10% and the US Government set up a bailout fund for failed banks.  As an extra tickler people had to cue up for hours just to get gas for their cars and they could only try to do this every 2nd day.  Yup, I’m the late 1970s/early 1980s.  FYI for those who don’t remember, the bailout fund was the R.T.C. – Resolution Trust Corp – and was created to buy ‘toxic’ assets from all the failed Savings & Loan banks.  Even on Wheel of Fortune, R.T.C. covers half of T.A.R.P.

Look, clearly what we are going through now is horrible.  Very very horrible.  Unemployment is rising but we’re still not even to 8% (a ‘boom year’ during the Depression).  In November of 2008 the markets hit their lowest point at -47% for the Dow and -52% for the S&P.  If you think this is painful, for us to get down to the Great Depression move of -90% things would have to get really crazy.  Bear with me for a second:

From down 50% (our current record) to down 90% (Great Depression) would mean the stock market would have to drop another, drum roll, 80% from here.  I know that sounds absurd but if you start with $1, down 50% means you have 50 cents left.  To get to down 90% (10 cents left), that 50 cents must drop another 40 cents… which is another 80%.  Math stinks, eh?  Imagine having to endure another 80% after 2008??

So to summarize:  the economy stinks, but it’s ludicrous to call this unprecedented.

2)  We all like to think we’re special, our friends are special, and the times we live in are special. And it’s true!  Just like all snowflakes are different, so are we… and so is every snowflake before us, after us, and next to us.  The social psychology term for elevating ourselves/our peer groups is called grandiosity, but that’s probably best left to the psychologists of this site.  The consequence of this characteristic is we latch on to ‘unprecedented’ because that gives us that extra feeling of grandiose.  We love jumping on the labels best/worst ever.  For example the ludicrous headlines of “best superbowl ever”. Heck, that wasn’t even the best one of the last two years.  Snoozer for 3 quarters (great interception return at the end of the first half), excellent last quarter.  I think I’m especially bitter about this because I had Pittsburg giving 7 and the under (0/2, for those keeping score), but I stand by my feeling that this grandiosity applies to ‘unprecedented’ as well.

3)  If something’s unprecedented, then we couldn’t have prepared for it, and therefore we’re absolved of guilt for allowing this to happen. This epitomizes the great reason of why the more erudite – those using ‘unprecedented’ while conscious of problems 1 & 2 – often use this word (I believe).

There was recently an encouraging article headline on CNN, “Obama’s speeches teach English.”  I’ll give you a minute to let this refreshing change of pace seep in.  I say we give him one of our leftover thousand points of light.

But I digress.  Even Obama is guilty of abusing the word ‘unprecedented’, citing in a radio address how, “We begin this year and this administration in the midst of an unprecedented crisis that calls for unprecedented action” (italics are mine).  He promptly contradicts ‘unprecedented’ (no similar event EVER, remember) when he says, “Just this week, we saw more people file for unemployment than at any time in the last 26 years”.  Since we’re all still in the Obama honeymoon period I’ll momentarily let him define unprecedented as, ‘not having occurred in the last 26 years’.  Fair enough.

So Obama has painted a severe picture at every turn.  I’ll definitely agree the picture is very severe, but what he’s also setting up is a situation where he can take all of the credit for good developments and avoid any blame for the bad ones.  He did the best he could in an unprecedented situation, after all!

The former heads of Lehman, AIG, and other failed banks all called their companies’ events unprecedented as well.  Here they did so not for politicking (though we WILL elect just about anyone…) but because none of them wanted to take any blame in the matter.  We would have been fine, but the unprecedented events in the (insert Housing Market, Credit Market, etc) destroyed us.

You know what the odd part is?  In a manner of speaking, the bosses of these banks didn’t do anything wrong.  I’ll address this strange twist in my next entry on the golden rule of economics:  “People respond to incentives in predictable ways”.

So what are your thoughts?

To learn more about Ben, click here to read his bio:

ben-iv

To receive updates enter your email in the “subscribe” box on the upper left side of the screen.  You’ll only receive ImagineAge updates.  Your email will NOT be sold.

ia_logo_button3

To become a Fan of ImagineAge on Facebook, click here!

To join the ImagineAge Group on Facebook, click here!

If you enjoyed this blog, click the button below to share it!

Share/Save/Bookmark

For constant site updates, make sure to subscribe to our RSS feed!

Posted 1 year ago at 12:08.

Add a comment

Categories

  • Recent Comments